Stronger signal could make things even worse, with possibility of over saturation of receiver input. The local city DVB-T transmitter is about 2-3 km at direct visibility. Typical value is 2 clicks per 90min movie, that is too few for just weak signal. Video processing systems, keeping A/V synchronization, and at the worst case to omit 1/2s - 12 frame GOP from MPG. Yes, PX cannot improve reception, this is matter of antenna systems.īut No, Antenna systems would not help you with signal path, and PX does help to fix the record at least to look nicer for I would not say the problem is the signal strength, but some unclear disturbations in the signal. But I would prefer Avisynth solution I am more familiar with. I suppose so, for sound it should not be difficult. No, i use +-1 as float values - in fact it should be or +-0.5 or 0 - 1 for integer PCM but i understand your convention and i use this convention. Of course wave format cannot produce more than what can produce. +/- 1 is relative scale of sound amplitude stored in WAV format. ProjectX can't help you to improve reception and signal with errors can be decoded correctly - key to solve your issue is improve RF signal reception which should be made with proper hardware (antenna and antenna localization) I would say ProjectX would eliminate most of them, but it seems not. Sometimes there is none, sometimes 2-3, sometimes 20 in case of near thunderstorm. It is a block of flat common wall source of TV signal, based on DVB-T receiver. I agree with improving idea, but this would be problem.
I am interested rather on encoding side than playback side.įoobar can decode and encode with DSP processing in real time.
0 kommentar(er)
